I was worrying a bit about that as well and was quite surprised that they did such a huge, 27-page cover story. I only expected one of these little, touristy, weekend-getaway stories when they asked me and a few friends for interviews.
But from the tone and content of the story, do you think it would attract the kind of people who could afford high rents, the DbAY kind of commuters, or the more alternative, simple-life, artsy, community-minded type of people? Tigger just described a big part of the Lamma population pretty well as "Lots of eco-friendly people, animal lovers, nature lovers, not to mention the odd drunk, some aging hippies, a few eccentrics, a few icons, and lots of different nationalities. A pretty interesting community."
Lamma could easily absorb a few hundred more of those people, like the ones interviewed in the MPW article, I think. They'd be a very positive influence, w/o driving up home prices even more. The sales/rental have peaked for now anyway, I'd think, a slow "downward correction" is way overdue, not just on Lamma but all over HK....
We have less than 0.1% of HK's population and it's actually slowly shrinking, definitely not growing at all. The vast majority of people, 99.99+%, will always be kept away from Lamma for many reasons, like the ferry commute, stories of dangerous wildlife and the assumed inconvenience of living without any supermarkets, fast food, chain stores, public transport, and "entertainment options". The readers of the article might like the story and pictures, shake their heads at the quaintness of it all, maybe visit for a weekend, walk the Family Trail, eat seafood, take lots of piccies, but ever moving here, NO WAY!
So I wouldn't worry too much of attracting hordes of new residents supposedly "spoiling" the place. The Lamma vibe and atmosphere will change ... slowly ... but it'll survive for many years to come, I hope.
_________________ Click here for Lamma-zine stories and recent Lamma Spotlights of the Week: Photo, Video, Person, Wildlife, Bird, Artwork.
|