zep {L_WROTE}:
To take an example from the MTR, Chai Wan and Wan Chai look as if they are the same words reversed. OK, so the Wan is the same (even if would be better written "waan") But how can a learner know that the "chai" in Wan Chai starts with a dz sound, has a short a vowel and is a rising tone and the "chai" in Chai Wan starts with a ts sound, has a long aa vowel and is a low falling tone?
If they were written in a real Pinyin it woujld be much easier.
Zep
I kind of agree. But then I learnt to speak Cantonese WITHOUT being able to read the characters. I HAVE met quite a number of English people (in England!) who can speak English but are illiterate.... And as a native English speaker I really don't care what a 'pluperfect tense' is... When we learn languages, there seems to be a few different ways and I find it a struggle with the standard 'textbook' style that ESF schools offer.
Here on Lamma, we have "Tai Peng" but in Cantonese; it sounds more like "Die Ping" which I can imagine is visually unappealing to English speakers...... Is that why they chose the less correct words? Maybe!