Forwarded from LIM:
This mail is from the Living Islands Movement, LIM, to keep you informed of current issues, meetings etc.
To know about LIM please visit:
http://www.livingislands.org.hk.
Dear members and friends
Please find LIM Ferry Proposal.
If you can't attend the meeting tomorrow and wish to epress your opinion, write to the following:
The Commissioner of Transport.
tdenq@td.gov.hk
The Secretary for Environment and Housing.
enquiry@thb.gov.hk
The District Officer (Islands)
isdcadm@isdc.had.gov.hk
The Legco transport panel (send to
pi@legco.gov.hk and request copying to members of it)
Our elected representatives in Legco (NT West):
Hon Albert CHAN Wai-yip
albert.wychan@yahoo.com.hk
Hon Albert HO Chun-yan
hotsewai@netvigator.com
Hon LEE Cheuk-yan
yanlee@hkctu.org.hk
Hon Mrs Selina CHOW LIANG Shuk-yee
selina@selinachow.com
Hon TAM Yiu-chung
yctam@dab.org.hk
Hon LEE Wing-tat
kwaifong56@yahoo.com.hk
Hon CHEUNG Hok-ming
hokming@ntas.org
Thank you.
Living Islands Movement
A solution to the continuing the ferry services
to Lantau and Peng Chau.
1. Proposal
The present service be continued under an interim franchise for at least three years (see para 2.4), preferably by First Ferry (see para. 2.1) - under the following conditions:
- at a reasonable fare increase, possibly the same as that emerging from the Cheung Chau route tender. ie 20%.
- public funds be used to compensate the ferry company for the financial losses, if any, over the this interim period This is based upon established policies of government - (see para 2.3)
- during the interim period, the area above the piers will be constructed to allow for commercial operations to provide non-fare income. If this is delayed, this interim period would be extended until it is ready. (See para. 2.4.)
- during the interim period, the legislation should be changed to allow a ten year franchise in future to give companies the ability to undertake the necessary investment and provide a future sustainable service.
- after the interim period, all services should be re-tendered for a franchise of ten years and include the benefit of the commercial income from the commercial space.
- closer audit be applied to the efficiency of the operation - notably the waste caused by excessive air-conditioning in the summer.
2. Basis for the proposal
2.1. The present situation has arisen because:
- The administrative processes for the renewal of the present services started too late to ensure quality and safety of any new operator in view of the lack of interest and the few operators who own spare capacity.
- The extra commercial space has denied and continues to deny the possibilities of non-fare revenues that is established for the rail services. The provision of this has been delayed by inaction of the government over many years.
2.2. Social considerations
- The residents of Lantau and Peng Chau should not have to bear the rise in fares due to this inaction which is not of their making nor of the ferry companies’.
- It must not be forgotten that, as with all islands, a ferry service is an integral part of the economy and life generally. Degrading a service has widespread impacts at personal levels of peoples' lives which, when added up, can lead to drastic changes and degradation in the well established economic, residential, social structure and environment of the island communities.
- The present isolated consideration of downgrading the ferry services is all the more reprehensible when another part of the government is drawing up plans to upgrade Mui Wo.
2.3. Apart from the established help given to MTRC through granting property rights, the government recently agreed to provide public funds for the projected new routes on Hong Kong island for the specific purpose of enabling the fares to be maintained at a reasonable level. These represent policies that are directly translatable to the ferry service in the form of a one-off payment or a "capital grant". No case has been made for denying these benefits from the residents of Lantau and Peng Chau.
2.4. The length of the interim period would be, nominally, three years but depend upon the time required for government action. The government has said that it needed at least three years to evaluate relevant land policies and future strategies for the entire ferry businesses.
Living Islands Movement
info@livingislands.org.hk
27/02/08