Xerxes {L_WROTE}:
Gatts {L_WROTE}:
Figures as expected I'd say. It was interesting to see that YLF's voters were all old generation local folk who not seemed to know any better. These will only diminish in future elections. Anyone managed to talk to Paul Lau and asked what exactly he wanted to prove by splitting the vote?
I was referringto this comment Alan
OK. That post does read like that.
But try to refer to the specific person who said something, not just "you" a dozen posts later when it seems you are addressing everyone on the non-YLF side.
Xerxes {L_WROTE}:
your message infers that they were old local folk who did not seem to know any better - I would say that as people who have perhaps lived here all their lives, they are exactly the people who should be deciding what happens to their island, unfortunately for those opposed to YLF - the old folks seem to like her, I assume they have their reasons
Right. What we need is a gerontocracy. Restrict voting to those over 75. Obviously they are the best placed to consider the future.
The elderly have a right to vote.
And so does everyone* else who has made their home here.
I've been here 20 years, my wife is Chinese, our daughter has spent her entire life here. Yet YLF, and apparently you, think that I'm an "outsider" who has no say about what happens here. If the villagers wanted to keep "their" island they could have just lived here and kept their "village houses" for the purpose they were supposedly constructed, preserving the village society. But they chose to cash in by selling and renting them out. And as this is not a feudal state, the people who live here have rights, not just the traditional land owners.
*with permanent residencypoilkoop {L_WROTE}:
That's quite a nice toilet seat , can someone grab it for me, it's obviously now very symbolic.
You'll find it on the left on the path up to Tai Peng, just past the bridge, on the more recent dumping site opposite the larger dump on the former lily pond.